HomeForeign correspondentExperts continue arguing over damage to Iran's nuclear sites by US bombing

Experts continue arguing over damage to Iran’s nuclear sites by US bombing

- Advertisement -
WASHINGTON, Jun 27 (APP):U.S. President Donald Trump has refuted leaked reports from his own Defence Intelligence Agency that the American bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities this past weekend had done only minimal damage, and that the Iranians had been able to move uranium from the sites before the strikes.
“Nothing was taken out of [the] facility,” Trump wrote on Truth Social on Thursday, adding it “would take too long, too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!”
This followed a statement late Wednesday by CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who said “credible intelligence” showed Iran’s nuclear sites at Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan had been severely damaged and that it would take years — not months — to rebuild several key facilities.
Ratcliffe’s statement, which he said was partially based on new intelligence from a “historically reliable and accurate source,” was the latest drop of information meant to bolster the U.S. argument that the airstrikes have crippled Iran’s ability to build a nuclear weapon.
In a live address to the nation on Saturday in the immediate aftermath of the strikes, Trump proclaimed Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities were “completely and totally obliterated.”
U.S. Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth said at a press conference Thursday that President Trump’s ‘decisive military action’ ended the ’12-day war’ between Israel and Iran. The conference followed  reports suggesting the damage was not as extensive as the Trump administration had been claiming.
In the confusing, tumultuous debate around the extent of the damage to the nuclear sites, a larger question looms: just where is Iran’s enriched uranium now?, It was pointed out.
Gaukhar Mukhatzhanova, a programme director at the Vienna Center for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation, says it’s unclear what has become of Iran’s 400 kilograms of uranium enriched at 60 per cent.
“We really don’t know where that material is,” she told CBC News via Zoom. “Did all of it survive the attacks? Did some of it survive the attacks? We don’t know, and right now, Iran is not providing that information.”
Iran, which acknowledges that its nuclear installations were “badly damaged,” claims to have moved its enriched uranium ahead of the U.S. strikes on the weekend.
Satellite imagery shows that on June 19, 16 cargo trucks were at the entrance of the deeply buried Fordow nuclear site. Three days later, in the early hours of Sunday morning, it was hit with multiple bombs, called Massive Ordnance Penetrators, each of which weighed 13,000 kilograms.
Before the U.S. became directly involved in the strikes, Israel says it had been targeting Iran’s military and nuclear infrastructure, along with security officials and scientists, since June 13.
Rafael Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), says Iran told the UN nuclear agency it had taken special measures to protect its stockpile.
He also said,  “Given the power of these devices and the technical characteristics of a centrifuge, we already know that these centrifuges are no longer operational, because they are fairly precise machines: there are rotors, and the vibrations [from the bombs] have completely destroyed them.” Still, there have been conflicting reports about just how much damage was sustained by Iran’s nuclear programme.
The Financial Times on Thursday published a report saying European governments had assessed that Iran’s uranium stockpile had been redistributed to sites outside of Fordow before the attack.
In his first public comments since the war began, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei also said on Thursday that Trump overstated the results of the strikes.
“The American president exaggerated events in unusual ways,” Khamenei said, adding that the US “gained nothing from this war”.
By his account, the US bombing campaign “did nothing significant” to Iran’s nuclear facilities.
While Thursday’s briefing with Hegseth offered details about the weaponry used in the June 22 attacks, analysts say it lacked evidence to justify the Trump administration’s assertions.
“The presser on US strikes on Iran was an orchestrated narrative, very much focused on the storytelling,”  Al Jazeera TV remarked.
RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular